Its ugly head

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Once again the specter of plagiarism is sighted, broadcast in shock-horror headlines:

Plagiarism on standardized tests three times higher in New Orleans schools than rest of Louisiana (The Lens, May 21, 2014).

As you read the story, you will find some good news, it’s not all bad. The number of tests voided for suspicious erasures fell between 2012 and 2013 across the State. In New Orleans, the number of tests voided for suspicious erasures was zero in 2013, according to The Lens’ report. Cause for celebration.

But the percentage of plagiarized standardized tests in New Orleans 2013 was three times higher than the rest of the State.  That is worrying.

It is worrying for two reasons. There is the question, why is the rate of plagiarism so much higher in New Orleans than in the rest of the State?

And there is the question, how do you plagiarize on a standardized test?

The answer, it appears, is in the definition of plagiarism.  Plagiarism, according to Test Security Irregularities 2012-2013 School Year, published by the Louisiana Department of Education in January 2014, is indicated by

… written responses that have suspect or common elements, indicating potential plagiarism such as a student brought unauthorized materials to testing and used them to assist in writing, copied another student’s response, or that teacher interference might have been a significant factor.

That is, surely, a questionable definition. Bringing “unauthorized materials” such as cheat sheets or programmable calculators or cell phones (and maybe writing on one’s leg or shirt cuff too?) are usually regarded as cheating in an examination, not as plagiarism.

Copying a fellow students answers (or sending or receiving signals) (or just plain talking?) are, again, forms of cheating in examinations, but they are not usually seen as forms of plagiarism.

And receiving direct or indirect help from a teacher is again not usually seen as plagiarism. It’s cheating, but it is not plagiarism.

It is very difficult to commit plagiarism in a closed-room closed-book examination. What seems to be needed is more awareness and better proctoring. And better definitions.

Plagiarism is a big enough issue – but maybe it is not as widespread as we are sometimes led to think?

One thought on “Its ugly head

  1. Pingback: Not plagiarism – again | Honesty, honestly…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.